Skip to main content

Carrying the pale forward, and going beyond it again.

Mark Williams, a radio personality, talking head, and tea-partyist, had made what may charitably be characterized as 'controversial' statements before stepping into the realm of satire on July 14.  After the NAACP passed a resolution condemning racist elements and acceptance of them within the Tea Party movement, Williams complained about the organization's supposed hypocrisy on NPR, CNN, and finally his own website, where he produced a gleefully racist letter purportedly written by NAACP President, Ben Jealous, to Abe Lincoln.  Among other things, it demanded the withdrawal of the 13th and 14th Amendments, and the return of slavery.  Within two days, it was taken down, and replaced by a non-apology denouncing racism, declaring the NAACP's title racist, saying his earlier satire was only condemned for its use of the term 'colored people', and, of course, calling for a healthy and open discourse on such matters.  Because Mark's such a good guy, he even offered to buy Ben Jealous a couple beers.

These sorts of antics can be seen to have worked out well for the tea party, so long as you believe 'no press is bad press'--which, in their case, it might not be.  In the age of infotainment, the media is happy to have jesters, and the Tea Party is often pleased to entertain.  What's more, those outlets which wish to retain some credibility as offering disinterested journalism are pressured by the right to avoid really going after these types, lest they be characterized as liberal and biased--or, worse, pressed to no longer rely on commentary from crazy talking heads like Mark.  Thus criticism of the really fringe-like actions of right wingers comes largely from the left, and therefore seems more liberal and "out of the mainstream".


Williams' original screed garnered him attention.  In a clever bait-and-switch, the present entry (at the same location) almost seems reasonable, and even cordial.  Having staked out new ground, Mark has found a way to make it look far less troubling than it actually is, and has thus paved the way for going yet further along that crazy road so often trod by American racists and bigots.

Go, man, go!

 Addendum July19

Apparently, the bait-and-switch wasn't clever enough for some, or maybe the pressure brought by the NAACP is having some effect.  Yesterday, Mark was expelled from the Tea Party Federation "because of the letter he wrote."  However, he remains a part of the Tea Party Express.  There are a lot of tea parties.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Political Notes

-Rick Santorum seems a somewhat likeable guy who believes several crazy, distasteful things. It may not be helpful to say his ideas are nuts, but it still is less useful to fashion him an evil man because his discriminatory views don't jive with the left, centre, or centre-right in America.

-Calling a person a 'front runner' before votes are counted is just plain wrong.  Calling one a front-runner after some votes are counted is slightly misleading.  The race isn't about who the media thinks is ahead, and it is only indirectly about who gets the most votes.  What really matters is accruing the most delegates.  In the race for a major party's nomination for POTUS, the guy with the most delegates-who-will-actually-vote-for-him-at-their-national-convention is ahead. If no delegates have been awarded, there isn't really a front-runner, no matter what polls might say.

-I doubt the primary process will hurt the eventual Republican nominee for POTUS all that much.…

Pointless Ruminations on the Absurd

The world around us is in no way required to conform to our expectations, beliefs, or desires. Rather, it is all but guaranteed to disappoint us, at least once or twice a lifetime. The loftier (or more deeply felt) our ideals, the more this may be true.

When we accept this incongruity and are keenly aware of it, but cannot change our thinking, absurdity steps in. The world no longer quite makes sense. It is untethered from rational or moral concerns, adrift in a bizarre joke told by no one.
Desire for normative order is often irrational and misplaced. Placing ethical constraints on amoral matters makes no sense. Yet these appear (sometimes, seemingly) inescapable conclusions. Hence the sensation of absurdity.

We can apply these incongruous demands to anything and anyone. But this is not a universal philosophy. It is a philosophy of the self, a diagnosis.

Well now.

I think I'm going to try to revive my online writing habits, outside of Facebook.

And what have I been thinking or feeling in the interim, across the last couple years or so? Well, I'm glad you asked.

In part, this.